![キリストは主である](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 171
- 1 562 293
キリストは主である
Приєднався 26 чер 2013
We are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ.
- 2 Corinthians 10:5
- 2 Corinthians 10:5
Reasoning With Unbelievers - Dr. Greg Bahnsen
Reasoning With Unbelievers - Dr. Greg Bahnsen
Переглядів: 103 150
Відео
Answering Evolution & Islam - Dr. Greg Bahnsen
Переглядів 47 тис.8 років тому
Answering Evolution & Islam - Dr. Greg Bahnsen
Is Purgatory Mentioned in 1 Corinthians 3? James White vs Tim Staples
Переглядів 19 тис.9 років тому
Can the Roman Catholic doctrine of purgatory be found in 1 Corinthians 3, which speaks of a man being tested and saved “through fire”? In this stirring debate from the Dividing Line radio program, Catholic Answers’ own Tim Staples squares off with James White, director of Alpha and Omega Ministries, to try and settle that very question.
Why you don't have to worry about debating atheists (Greg Bahnsen)
Переглядів 37 тис.9 років тому
Why you don't have to worry about debating atheists (Greg Bahnsen)
If there is no God, how do you explain the existence of the universe?
Переглядів 3,3 тис.9 років тому
If there is no God, how do you explain the existence of the universe?
Greg Bahnsen gracefully ends the debate
Переглядів 46 тис.9 років тому
In this clip Mr. Tabash and Dr. Bahnsen make their closing statements. Here are highlights: MR. TABASH CLOSING REMARKS I don't have to know how the universe was formed [but I do know that it wasn't God who did it] Why aren't there any miracles today? Where is the proof that Jesus did any miracles? We shouldn't believe in a God who sends people to hell; we should believe in one who loves everybo...
Atheists are primitive in their thinking (Greg Bahnsen)
Переглядів 26 тис.9 років тому
In this clip Dr. Bahnsen makes his opening statement. Here are highlights: - The atheists live inconsistent lives - Atheists will presuppose human dignity by attending a friend's funeral then later affirm that human life is no different than an animal - Atheists are primitive in their thinking - Atheists do not have a workable worldview - Evolutionists have an irrational worldview that life spo...
Greg Bahnsen Provides Edward Tabash (& Carl Sagan) Extraordinary Evidence For Christianity
Переглядів 7 тис.9 років тому
Greg Bahnsen Provides Edward Tabash (& Carl Sagan) Extraordinary Evidence For Christianity
How do you defend biblical inerrancy?
Переглядів 3,6 тис.9 років тому
How do you defend biblical inerrancy?
How can you support abortion and condemn Nazi atrocities at the same time?
Переглядів 2 тис.9 років тому
How can you support abortion and condemn Nazi atrocities at the same time?
Atheist compassion is superior? (Greg Bahnsen)
Переглядів 2,8 тис.9 років тому
Atheist compassion is superior? (Greg Bahnsen)
What is the proof that the bible is inspired by God?
Переглядів 8 тис.9 років тому
What is the proof that the bible is inspired by God?
Seventh-day Adventism - Walter Martin vs William Johnsson (3 of 5)
Переглядів 9 тис.9 років тому
Seventh-day Adventism - Walter Martin vs William Johnsson (3 of 5)
Seventh-day Adventism - Walter Martin vs William Johnsson (4 of 5)
Переглядів 59 тис.9 років тому
Seventh-day Adventism - Walter Martin vs William Johnsson (4 of 5)
Seventh-day Adventism - Walter Martin vs William Johnsson (2 of 5)
Переглядів 12 тис.9 років тому
Seventh-day Adventism - Walter Martin vs William Johnsson (2 of 5)
Seventh-day Adventism - Walter Martin vs William Johnsson (5 of 5)
Переглядів 29 тис.9 років тому
Seventh-day Adventism - Walter Martin vs William Johnsson (5 of 5)
Seventh-day Adventism - Walter Martin vs William Johnsson (1 of 5)
Переглядів 24 тис.9 років тому
Seventh-day Adventism - Walter Martin vs William Johnsson (1 of 5)
Polemics: Lecture 02 - Dr. James White
Переглядів 1,3 тис.9 років тому
Polemics: Lecture 02 - Dr. James White
Polemics: Lecture 06 - Dr. James White
Переглядів 1 тис.9 років тому
Polemics: Lecture 06 - Dr. James White
Polemics: Lecture 03 - Dr. James White
Переглядів 1,1 тис.9 років тому
Polemics: Lecture 03 - Dr. James White
Polemics: Lecture 11 - Dr. James White
Переглядів 6249 років тому
Polemics: Lecture 11 - Dr. James White
Polemics: Lecture 07 - Dr. James White
Переглядів 8829 років тому
Polemics: Lecture 07 - Dr. James White
Polemics: Lecture 01 - Dr. James White
Переглядів 3,8 тис.9 років тому
Polemics: Lecture 01 - Dr. James White
When you don't keep God's ten commandments, your preaching is in vain. This guy Walter Martin misinterpreted so many scriptures like other theologians.
Thank God that 'Walter Martin's noise has finally gone away. RIP I hope that he will make it to God's Kingdom since he was just too busy attacking all religion.
Dr. Brown's very first rebuttal at 40:10 is wrong. Those daughters argued for a share of land, not tribal affiliation. For example my father is not Jewish, My mother is a bas kohen. If she was from the tribe of Levi, I am not a Levi, instead I am a yisroel (a general catch-all)
If you think the rabbi won this debate your are not being honest with yourself. Insulting your opponent and being petulant doesn’t make you a debate winner. His arguments had zero basis in scripture or history.
When Jesus said if you fast and pray and give to charity you will suffer, this was a follow on from what was said just before this, and explains about the results of stoning someone with rocks - that if they did that then their darkness would corrupt their prayers, fasts and donations. It makes perfect sense and isn't just one saying on its own.
Avalos beat the crap out of Craig the mafioso.lucrative lier
This guy, James White is so arrogant. He thinks that he is Mr. l know it all.
Dumb discussion. I threw away 1 hour and 45 minutes here. No talk about how (and why!) Jesus is the Son of God. All this talk about the political-earthly branches of faith. So stupid. These kind of talks need to be at least 8 hours. Or a full weekend or something. But these 'discussions' are postmodern, simpel look-at-me-now talks. It's all meh.
People's lives have changed by the Holy Spirit. Healing the sick, casting put demons, and raising the dead. Believers have done these things.
Jesus burial, God raised from dead, tomb empty, people saw Him alive, God exists, God raised Jesus from the dead.
Precursor was Lazarus' death Jesus spoke..he came.
Bahnsen used a Black and White fallacy; Christian God or Atheism. Even if I accept that Atheism is fallacious, Christianity is not the only alternative, there are the thousands of other existing and historical religions and an Infinite number of possible religions.
Theism is just primitive superstition and baseless faith in supernatural forces.
I often challenge atheists to make a positive, scientific, evidence based case FOR their own naturalistic faith position. They can't do it. When it comes to what they believe-they cannot meet their own standard. Who knew? [face-palm]
_"I often challenge atheists to make a positive, scientific, evidence based case FOR their own naturalistic faith position."_ ...because you're not interested in an honest conversation where you first inquire as to your interlocutors position and how they arrived at it. You're more interested in plowing forward with your presup script wherein you try to force your interlocutor to defend a position they don't necessarily hold to in a manner that isn't necessarily consistent with their worldview. _"They can't do it. "_ Not at all surprising they can't meet your arbitrary challenge. _"When it comes to what they believe-they cannot meet their own standard."_ That's not their standard, it's one you invented, in order to win arguments on the internet. But likewise when I actually _ask_ Christians what their position is, and how they arrived at it, and to offer a rational defense of it, they never can seem to meet their own, self professed standards. I'd ask you, but we both know good and well that you'll never ever submit your worldview to an internal critique because you know it won't hold up under the slightest bit of scrutiny. And any feigned willingness you might put forth is just a subterfuge so you can try and run your script again and just interrogate the other party without ever defending your own worldview.
@@ajhieb I'm not interested? How do you know that? Why do you think I stated that I lead in with... a question? Yeah, you have no evidence whatsoever to support anything you just said. Give me a break. If you can't handle the non-arbitrary challenge that's been presented, just say so. Don't lie and claim it is arbitrary. Since when it is "arbitrary" to make the case for the position that anyone holds about anything at all? And why are you claiming that invented the standard that virtually ALL atheists arbitrarily assume-that being "evidence"? Dude, what is wrong with you? Are you really this desperate to escape the challenge? Are you admitting that you don't have good reasons, nor do you have any empirical scientific evidence to support whatever your position is? Hey, how about this: What exactly is your position and why do you hold it? How does your worldview answer the most fundamental question of existence we humans tend to ask, such as: origins, meaning, morality, and ultimate destiny? As for the false claim you make to end your diatribe, well, I'd be more than happy to oblige... after you. (Since I challenged you first.) What do you say? Are you up to the challenge-even the challenge of defending any of the claims you made above? You bluff; I call!
@@jessebryant9233 _"I'm not interested?"_ Correct. _"How do you know that?"_ Your response just demonstrated it. _"Why do you think I stated that I lead in with... a question?"_ You didn't start... _"I often challenge atheists to make a positive, scientific, evidence based case FOR their own naturalistic faith position."_ ...with a question, did you? _"Yeah, you have no evidence whatsoever to support anything you just said."_ Sure I do. You're a presupper. That's what presuppers do. So that's what you're doing. Basic deductive inference. (That, and it's just painfully obvious) _"Don't lie and claim it is arbitrary."_ Don't lie and claim it's not. Demanding that someone defend something that isn't entailed in their worldview is arbitrary. Demanding they do it via a methodology that isn't required in their worldview is arbitrary. _"And why are you claiming that invented the standard that virtually ALL atheists arbitrarily assume-that being "evidence"? "_ English. Do you speak it? Or have I chosen to interact with the world's worst presup AI? Empirical evidence is the standard by which most people judge empirical claims. Most people's worldviews aren't making empirical claims, so evidence is irrelevant. So would you care to prove me wrong and allow an internal critique of your worldview, or are you going to continue to prove me right by desperately trying to get back on to your presupper script so you can stay on offense and never bother defending your own worldview?
@@ajhieb So you're not gonna meet the challenge... or is it just that you can't?
@@jessebryant9233 I challenged you Chief, and it's clear you don't have the stones to accept. Not only did I challenge you, I predicted the outcome and your obvious attempt to get back to your silly little presupper script. So far you haven't disappointed. Next you can try and make more excuses for why I should address your challenge first, along with a totally insincere promise to put your worldview up for scrutiny after you're done with mine. Sorry, bub. I've dealt with too many presuppers before you to fall for that obvious lie. But if you wanna have an interesting discussion without having a worldview pissing contest (which is clearly what you're here for) we can talk about all the failings of Bahnsen, Frame, Van Til et al, and how the presup apologetic is nothing but a meaningless tautology that says nothing useful about the truth of Christianity, nor the falsity of any other worldview. But my guess is you'll run from that too.
Laws of logic are material; they exists as representations in human brains, using matter
When I talk with an atheist, I asked them give me the scientific proof that evolution has occurred following the scientific model. Not one of them has ever tried to give me that proof, why, because it doesn’t exist. There is no scientific proof that evolution has occurred because following the model, someone would’ve had to observe the whole entire process and who is that? The atheist truly is the one who checks their brain at the door.
That’s the problem with the atheist when he tries to recover. Silverman makes the statement I could be wrong about everything I know. The Christian never admits that or at least I hope they don’t. But the atheist has to backtrack and then try to explain away his ridiculous answer.
Shut up already Silverman
Sir Mike is much more alive more than he was. At the Lords presence. ❤ Greetings from 2024 😁😁
As someone in both faiths since I was young, the debate is closer than people think. The Rabbi did misinterpret some Christian scriptures completely incorrectly, ie. circumcision.
So you are telling people what they should think? Obviously you don't believe Rabbi Schochet, you CAN'T. He said Jesus can't be the Messiah and you say he is. Same with the trinity.
Thank you for taking a stand on the bible!!! Theistic " Devolution"..ahem i mean " Evolution" is sin!
As a gentile Christian I think what’s interesting is that most Jews don’t seem to care at all about sharing what they believe is true about the Scriptures with gentiles. The true God cares about Jews and Gentiles the same. The Jewish stance seems to be just believe whatever because we don’t really care what gentiles believe. It makes sense to me that God would want to call all people to Himself through His Son Jesus.
I somewhat understand, but telling people they are rotten from birth and most are going to hell, that's the "good news" you want to hear? Jews have the seven laws of Noah that are set out for non-Jews. Jews lived peacefully with other faiths. They believed they were to set an example, not convert everyone. I think they were waiting for the Messiah and then people would unite under God's Kingdom. But Jews didn't prevent people from following God.
1:08:00
So, this all happened 2,000 years ago, which is pretty convenient.
Reasoning with believers is a much more difficult task, am I right?
Universalist do not say 'if he can do, he must do it' but 'because he can do it, he will do it'. God's will and good pleasure will make Mankind in His image and likeness. This is all down to God's Sovereignty and freedom to do whatever he chooses. In the completion of his saving purposes all his attributes will be clearly demonstrated but mercy will triumph over judgement. Romans 11v32-36
In his critique of the Universalist passages in the Bible he does what he says universalist do with theses passages. He starts with his philisophical paradigm (the fundamental truth of eternal conscious torment) and fits these passages into this paradigm.
“… because the bible.” Lmao
What do you have when it comes to what you believe and why?
The beautiful thing is that every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus christ is Lord 🙏
As D psalm 14 verse 1 talks about a fool that could be anybody .
Dr. Craig's evidence fir Jesus and the resurrection are the anonymously written gospels written decades based on tales and legends orally transmitted by people qho were not eyewitnesses to Jesus amd stories about Jesus.
The trinity side lost me when they admitted they came from the Catholic Church.
It's too bad that serious philosophers never took Bahnsen serious enough to debate him so he got to run philosophical circles around scientists and lawyers and such.
No, obviously not. There, saved you 2 wasted hrs! 😂
Sir Anthony Buzzard- at 11:00 position, is always dead on, a true legend. at least one of the others on the panel is truly doing satan's work.
5:34 Kek
Imagine jesus who is the logos of God. He rebuked the hypocrisy of those who believed in his father. Not atheist
0:59 1:02 apologetics is the wisdom of this world. The beginning of wisdom is the fear of the Lord. If these teachers think they can have all the answers, they forget without the fear of not becoming legalistic and cold and unforgiving towards others,you forget you under his grace.
Unless you're going to offer some justification for your beliefs, you are also just providing an opinion. As an atheist I have one position: all efforts to convince me a god exists have failed. Look, nothing arbitrary or inconsistent. Now what? So, what do you believe and why? Convince me. Lastly and of most importance: Could you be wrong?
Just asking religious people to define a belief would keep them occupied for a bit.
Where us Brown's rebuttal?
Hey shamounian! I’m struggling watching some of these debates! Are there any sources you could point me to to refute Jews on their claim Jesus isn’t the messiah? Thank you and may the Lord bless you.
Walter sinnott-amstrong destroys Craig
God made Adam and Eve not two women or two men. Sexual sin in all forms are sin. Love the sinner not the sin.
This purgation happens on the Day. That would be the Second Coming not a prior period ie death. The agent of purification is the blood of Christ only. Which happened on Good Friday for those who believe. Which will come to light on the Last Day.
Sorry dude, Hitler was most certainly a theist of some description. His bloody army had the the phrase Gott mit uns ('God [is] with us') on their belt buckles. He had special units that sole purpose was to hunt down religious artifacts because he believed it would help him win the war!... No, Hitler definitely believed in a god.
This is edited. No Dr Brown Rebuttal. May be to show Rabbis win
they cover the same issues, every time, eh...
They cover what they need to.
What rubbish. As if he did not use his unaided reason and faculties to arrive at his conclusion that his god aided his reason and his faculties. Circular much?
What have you got? ... Hm?
TRINITY WINS AGAIN
Dirty Harry is just of his father...The DEVIL.ABOMINATION, Changing the truth of GOD into a LIE.
The fact that these types of arguments are occurring within the Christian faith speak to a larger problem: despite Mr White's assertion of inerrancy, the mere existence of this lecture and the branching of the faithful into 10,000 separate factions with 10,000 different interpretations proves orherwise. I doubt that the Holy Spirit has spoken to the hearts and minds of many who claim this gift, including Mr. White.